Generic where generic is good
Accounting, payments and commodity infrastructure often belong in proven specialist tools.
That's not a problem. Until your software assumes that it does.
Accounting, payments and commodity infrastructure often belong in proven specialist tools.
Your customer journey, operating model and service delivery rarely fit a template perfectly.
People should see the information and actions that matter to them, not learn the whole system.
The underlying information can stay connected while warehouse, finance, relationship owners and customers each see only the job in front of them.
Same underlying organisation. Completely different experience depending on the job.
See the items that need packing, the stock location and the next action. Nothing else.
See money, reconciliation, exceptions and the things that need judgement.
See the people, history, opportunities and promises that matter to the relationship.
See their own journey. They should never have to understand your internal architecture.
If every person in your organisation could have a screen designed only for the job they are doing, what would disappear from it?
Our work on Yopla Platform and resident-service concepts is built around this idea: the underlying organisation can stay connected while each person sees only the information and actions relevant to them.
See the work →Each chapter starts with a real situation rather than another abstract software claim.
That is fine. Until your software assumes that it is.
See the story →WEEK 06Quite a lot, actually. Custom does not mean rebuilding everything.
See the story →WEEK 07People should see the job, not the whole system.
See the story →WEEK 08Not a software specification. Just tell us what happens.
See the story →Tell us who is involved, what happens now and where it gets awkward. We will show you how the experience could fit each person better.